At the end, a question from the audience sparked an almost rhetorical response from Crawford. Everyone these days thinks they're an interior designer. (Personally, if I have one more person tell me they think they have a calling just because they like to rearrange their furniture, or because they've helped a friend buy cushions, I'm going to quit, or give them a job!) Crawford's insight: everyone thinks they're an expert in interiors. But do we tell the chef in a restaurant to change things more to our liking? Do we tell a lawyer we didn't like their closing statement? Better yet, do we argue with a doctors verdict? Disagree with a structural engineer? (Or try and negotiate with any of these other service providers on their fees?). It's a good point.
The success of Studio Ilse's latest project in Hong Kong, a low rise residential development - 226 Hollywood Rd (which I posted about here) - in my opinion, is a victory for all Hong Kongers. In a city where most residential developments are quite homogenous, hyper dense and high rise, 226 is a shining beacon. The developers - Blake's - took a risk. They are the new kids on the property development block, and apparently several other old-school developers who are mentors told them it would never work. All of the apartments sold within weeks. Admittedly there were only half a dozen or so, but I think it still proves a point. That there is room for differentiation in a city like Hong Kong.
Crawford reiterated that a designer can only be as good as their client allows, and hopefully the courage and tenacity of this developer will be an example to other property developers around the world. To take risks, to do something out of the norm, and to help play their part in making our cities more livable and more attractive, for us and future generations. Buildings last a long time.